Wonderful new revolving sculpture at London’s St Pancras station

July 9th, 2016 by Roger Darlington

Yesterday, I started and ended the day at St Pancras railway station in central London, meeting my sister from her train from Leicester and then taking her back there for her train home. St Pancras is always an exciting place, but this time I was captivated by a revolving and twisted blade of aluminium hanging over the arrival point for the Eurostar trains.

My sister and I had dinner at a restaurant just opposite the sculpture and it was apparent that everyone loved the simplicity and magic of it. I made a short video and put it on my Facebook page. But I wanted to know more about who created the work and what the artist intended.  I found the answers – and you can see a picture  – here.

Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)


Has anyone actually read the Chilcot Report?

July 8th, 2016 by Roger Darlington

The Chilcot Report on the invasion of Iraq consists of 12 volumes adding up to some 2.6 million words. Even the Executive Summary runs to 145 pages.

According to an item in the “Guardian” newspaper, on average people read about 250 words a minute so, on that estimate, it would take 10,400 minutes or about 173 hours to read the whole of the Chilcot Report.

Assuming you spent eight hours on it every day and took weekends off, that makes digesting the whole report about a month’s full-time work.

I repeat: has anyone actually read the Chilcot Report?

Posted in British current affairs, World current affairs | Comments (0)


A review of the action comedy “Central Intelligence”

July 7th, 2016 by Roger Darlington

Hard day at the office? Want to unwind and laugh a bit? You could do worse than view this new release which pairs The Rock with The Mouth. Check out my review here.

Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)


What Alastair Campbell has to say about the Chilcot Inquiry on the Iraq War

July 7th, 2016 by Roger Darlington

If ever the word tragedy was appropriate, it applies in spades to the whole experience of the Iraq War. It is too simple to view the actions of British politicians and officials – especially Tony Blair – as the acts of evil men. Enormous mistakes were made but essentially they were made by people who had good intentions – hence the tragedy. I was particularly struck by this blog posting from Blair’s communications chief at the time, Alastair Campbell. In part, he states:

“I was one of the few people who saw the process of his making the decision close up, virtually round the clock, around the world. Far from seeing someone hellbent on war, I saw someone doing all he could to avoid it. Far from seeing someone undermine the UN, I saw him trying his hardest to make it work. Far from seeing someone cavalier about the consequences of war, I saw someone who agonised about them, and I know he still does, as do all who were there, part of his team.

He was of course bombarded by views, from friend and foe. He was acutely aware of protest. He was aware that much could go wrong. He was aware lives would be lost. He was conscious of the possibility of damage to our relationship with the US if we didn’t go with them, and damage to the relationship with other allies if we did.

But here is the difference between him and other ministers and MPs, him and advisors, him and commentators, him and the public who three times elected him, including after the fall of Saddam. He had to decide. One way or the other. With the US or not. Topple Saddam or leave him. Knowing that either way there were consequences which were hard to foresee.”

Posted in British current affairs, World current affairs | Comments (0)


What is blue, green and grey water?

July 6th, 2016 by Roger Darlington

As part of my work as a consumer advocate, for over four years now I’ve been active in the water sector chairing a Customer Challenge Group for South East Water. So I’ve been attending lots of discussions and events about water and trying to keep up with all the acronyms and terminology in the sector.

I was thrown when I first heard references to blue, green and grey water. What on earth is this all about, I thought – and you might too.

The blue ​water refers to ​freshwater. ​

The green ​water refers to ​water stored in ​soil.

The grey ​water is ​polluted water. ​

I understand that globally ​there is enough ​freshwater on ​our planet to ​support ​even 10 billion ​people ​(not if we all ​live like in ​the USA), ​but grey ​water can dangerously pollute ​blue and green ​water.

In an online discussion of the different types of water, I found this analysis:

“Rain fed ​agriculture ​covers 80% of ​the world’s ​cultivated land,​ and is ​responsible for ​about 60% of ​crop production.​ In rain fed ​agriculture the ​soil stores the ​rain and ​releases it ​slowly to the ​plants. This ​rainwater used ​in agriculture ​is part of what ​is called ‘​green ​water’ ​and is a ​characteristic ​of the land on ​which it falls. ​It is usually ​not subject to ​competition ​from other ​sectors. ​

Yields in ​rain fed ​agriculture are ​still far from ​their potential.​ In 2005, ​cereal yields ​were about 1.1.​5 tonnes per ​hectare in Sub-​Saharan Africa, ​compared with 5 ​tonnes per ​hectare in ​Europe. ‘​Green ​water’ or ​rain fed ​agriculture has ​an important ​role to play in ​sustaining ​populations and ​securing future ​food supplies.

By contrast, ​in irrigation, ​water is ​extracted from ​rivers, lakes ​and aquifers (​which is ​referred to as ​‘blue ​water’). ​This ‘​blue water’​ is applied on ​land, where ​most of is ​consumed by ​evapo ​transportation. ​Irrigation ​competes with ​other sectors (including the ​environment) ​for ‘blue ​water.’ ​Today irrigated ​agriculture ​covers about 20%​ of cultivated ​land and ​accounts for 40%​ of global food ​production. ​’Grey ​water’ is ​polluted or ​waste water, ​which can be ​recycled and ​purified. Grey ​water will play ​an important ​role in ​securing future ​global water ​supplies.”

So, now you know …​

Posted in Environment | Comments (0)


Was Marx actually a Marxist?

July 5th, 2016 by Roger Darlington

I’ve just watched a recording of the BBC 4 profile of Karl Marx, the first programme in a new short series of great thinkers presented by British historian Bettany Hughes.

I’ve always recoiled from most of the ideas in Marxism and, when I read a biography of Marx, I rather recoiled from the man himself. In particular, I felt that this was not a man who lived life according to my own principles of decency and kindness.

You can read my review of this biography here.

Posted in History | Comments (0)


American independence – then and now

July 4th, 2016 by Roger Darlington

On 4 July 1776, the American Declaration of Independence was announced. On this anniversary day, I send good wishes to all my American friends both in the USA and elsewhere.

So, 240 years on, how is the Republic doing? Even many Americans struggle to comprehend how the American constitution and American politics are working out.

So I offer my short guide to the American political system.

Posted in American current affairs | Comments (0)


The enduring appeal of the rom-com movie

July 3rd, 2016 by Roger Darlington

I’m a big movie fan and an incurable romantic so I enjoy a good romantic comedy and this weekend I attended a course on the history of rom-coms held at the City Literary Institute in London.  The lecturer was male (Guy Meredith) but, except for me, all the eight students were female.

Our lecturer told us that all stories have four basic elements: world, characters, tone, and plot. All rom-coms have essentially the same plot: boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy wins girl back (or, of course, a reversal of these gender roles).  So, to make a rom-com different, the writer and director need to manipulate the other three story elements: world, character, tone.

At the opening of the course, each of us was invited to name our favourite rom-com and a recent one that we have seen. I offered “When Harry Met Sally …” [my review here] and “The Meddler” [my review here] respectively.

During the one-day course, we were shown clips from 11 films – not all of which I would regard as rom-coms: “The General”, “It Happened One Night”, “Once” [my review here], “About A Boy” [my review here], “The Third Man”, “Tootsie”, “Fever Pitch” [my review here], “Knocked Up” [my review here],  “Music & Lyrics” [my review here], one segment of “Paris Je T’aime”, and “Sideways” [my review here].

Which is your favourite rom-com?

Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)


A review of the film “Suite Francaise”

July 2nd, 2016 by Roger Darlington

This wartime love story has unusual origins and unconventional characterisations, so it is worth looking up. I’ve reviewed it here.

Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)


Why is there so much irrational opposition to genetically modified food?

July 2nd, 2016 by Roger Darlington

“The United Nations Food & Agriculture Program has noted that global production of food, feed and fiber will need approximately to double by 2050 to meet the demands of a growing global population. Organizations opposed to modern plant breeding, with Greenpeace at their lead, have repeatedly denied these facts and opposed biotechnological innovations in agriculture. They have misrepresented their risks, benefits, and impacts, and supported the criminal destruction of approved field trials and research projects.

We urge Greenpeace and its supporters to re-examine the experience of farmers and consumers worldwide with crops and foods improved through biotechnology, recognize the findings of authoritative scientific bodies and regulatory agencies, and abandon their campaign against “GMOs” in general and Golden Rice in particular.”

This is the opening to a short, but powerful, letter signed by 110 Nobel Prize-winning scientists, almost all of whom earned their prizes in the fields of physics, chemistry or medicine.

In 2014, the Pew Research Center found an enormous gap between the public and scientists on this issue. Just 37 per cent of adults in the United States said genetically modified foods were safe to eat, while 88 per cent of scientists connected to the American Association for the Advancement of Science said the same.

It is time to look at the science and listen to reason. The world’s poor need GM foods.

Posted in Environment | Comments (0)