A review of the new film “May December”
November 19th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
At the heart of this ambitious and ambiguous movie from director Todd Haynes are two enigmatic and ultimately unsympathetic female characters. There is Gracie Atherton-Yoo (a wonderful Julianne Moore), who 24 years earlier went to prison for having sex with a teenage boy whom she later married, and Elizabeth Berry (an outstanding Natalie Portman), an actress carrying out research for her portrayal of the younger Gracie in a sensitive, independent film.As Haynes has put it in an interview: “You keep shifting back and forth between trusting and mistrusting one or the other”. Caught in between these two women, who are in their different ways both manipulative, is Gracie’s young husband Joe Yoo (an impressive Charles Melton).
The story is loosely based on the actual case of Mary Kay Letouneau, a teacher who seduced her very young pupil. This exploration of the ethical dilemma is an immensely stylish work.
Set in Savannah, Georgia, the play of light through windows and on caterpillars is truly captivating. The music – an adaptation of the Michel Legand theme from “The Go-Between” – is striking and disturbing. Two of the most memorable scenes are when Gracie applies make-up to Elizabeth and when Elizabeth gives a soliloquy direct to camera.
This is almost as far from blockbuster material as you could imagine but, if you want to see a character-driven movie with two actresses at the top of their game, this is highly commended.
Posted in Consumer matters | Comments (0)
A review of the new Netflix offering “The 355”
November 18th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
I’m all in favour of female action figures and there’s some thespian talent in this espionage thriller, but this is a thinly-plotted effort that all too obviously is contrived to appeal to the widest possible audience on television screens.So we have no less than a quintet of leading actresses: Jessica Chastain for American viewers, Diane Kruger for European viewers, Bingbing Fan for Chinese viewers, Lupita Nyong’o for black viewers, and Penélope Cruz for Latino viewers.
American Theresa Rebeck is responsible for the story and co-writer of the script which has the female five chasing a small device that can hack and control any part of the Internet and any electronic network (yeh ….) while racing around exotic locations ranging from Morocco to China (actually Taiwan).
It is a non-stop smorgasbord of running, fighting and shooting with twist after twist, making it something of a bubblegum movie, sweet and chewy but instantly forgettable. And only an American would come up with the contrived title which is a reference to Agent 355, the codename of an unidentified female spy who fought for the Patriots during the American Revolution.
Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)
As we await the new blockbuster movie “Napoleon”, a reminder of who he was and how he met his Waterloo
November 18th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
The end of the 18th and the beginning of the 19th century witnessed nearly a quarter of a century of almost continuous war in Europe. The French Revolutionary Wars of 1793-1802 and the Napoleonic Wars of 1803 -1815 embroiled all the great European states and caused the death of between five and six million combatants and civilians. No one did more to perpetuate these wars than the French Emperor Napoleon Bonaparte and no one did more to oppose and defeat Napoleon’s forces than the British Duke of Wellington.These two commanders never met, never corresponded, and only faced each other in battle once, but were frequently in the other’s thoughts and communications.
Napoleone Buonoparte and Arthur Wellesley – as they were called at the time – were born in the same year of 1769, although controversy exists in both cases as to the exact day. Both were born on islands – Napoleon on Corsica and Wellington on Ireland – although neither was keen to emphasise the association. If ever they had met or even corresponded, no doubt they would have used French which was the second language of each. In both cases, they lost their father while young and were brought up with four brothers and three sisters in straitened circumstances by formidable mothers.
Napoleon’s rise to power could hardly have been more meteoric and, by the age of 35, he was Emperor of France. Yet some suggest that such speed of promotion left Napoleon with an Achilles heel because he never handled infantry in combat at regimental level, a lack of experience which was to cost him dear at Waterloo. By contrast, Wellington spent seven years learning his military craft in India, before he joined the British expeditionary force opposing Napoleon’s armies in Portugal and Spain. For Napoleon, Waterloo was the end of his career and he died on St Helena, aged 51, whereas Wellington went on to become British Prime Minister (twice) and lived to the ripe old age of 83.
Napoleon won 60 of his 70 battles; Wellington fought far fewer (14 in the Iberian peninsular), but won them all. For both men, Waterloo – fought on Sunday 18 June 1815 – was their last. Napoleon had 71,947 men to Wellington’s 67,660, but the French had 246 cannon to the Allies’ 156. Wellington was aged 46, Napoleon 45, yet Wellington acted as energetically as a man in his 20s, Napoleon as lethargically as someone in his 60s (possibly because of piles).
In a fiercely-fought battle, Wellington held out long enough to be joined by the Prussian forces led by Blücher, so that the French collapsed. Interestingly Blücher wanted to call the battle La Belle Alliance after the farmhouse where he met Wellington; the French called the conflict the battle of Mont St Jean after the place where it was in fact fought; but it was Wellington who decided to name it after his own headquarters some two and a quarter miles away.
Napoleon was hoping to retire to the United States. The Prussians wanted to execute him, but Wellington refused to allow this and a British civil servant came up with the idea of exile on St Helena. Here the former emperor had plenty of time to come up with a host of different reasons why he failed to defeat Wellington.
Napoleon and Wellington tended to be small-minded about each other: the Frenchman referred to Wellington as “the sepoy general” (a reference to his role in India), while Wellington insisted on spelling the Emperor’s name the Italian way (Buonoparte). Following Napoleon’s first exile to Elba, Wellington contrived to sleep with two of the former emperor’s mistresses.
Napoleon had a growing regard for Wellington’s abilities as events led them to the battlefield at Waterloo, but afterwards came to loathe the British general, in part because he believed that Wellington was responsible for the execution of Marshal Ney and for his exile to St Helena (neither of which was true). For his part, before Waterloo, Wellington was publicly contemptuous but privately admiring of Napoleon, several times averring that the presence of the French Emperor on a battlefield was worth 40,000 men, but later he came to despise the man, not least because Napoleon left a gift in his will to a man who had attempted to assassinate the British leader.
Let’s see how British director Ridley Scott tells the story in his epic film. Of one thing we can be sure: the French won’t like it. But I’ll be viewing it in IMAX on the day of release.
Posted in History | Comments (0)
If you were going to launch a rocket into space, which direction would you do it? East or west?
November 17th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
Most countries launch space rockets eastwards because the Earth spins west to east and launching eastwards gives rockets a boost from the Earth’s rotational speed.
But Israel, with its Shavit space launch vehicle, launches due west against the planet’s spin. This ensures that the rockets fly over the Mediterranean Sea and not over Israel and then neighbouring Arab countries, some of which remain hostile to it.
This is done for the protection of populations and because Israel does not want its Arab neighbours mistaking a space launch for a missile attack.
This is one of many facts which I discovered while reading “The Future Of Geography” by Tim Marshall.
Posted in Science & technology | Comments (0)
A review of the new film “Past Lives”
November 11th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
At a time when so many films are sequels, prequels or remakes, it’s so refreshing to welcome an original story told in an original way.I’m reminded of “The Farewell” (2019) which was written and directed by a Chinese-American, set largely in China, with most of the dialogue in Mandarin. “Past Lives” (2023) is written and directed by a Korean-Canadian (a wonderfully-assured Celine Song in her debut feature film), alternates between Seoul and New York, with use of Korean most of the time. Both works are semi-autobiographical and explore cultural differences between Asia and America.
A key theme in this movie is the Korean concept of inyeon which is the notion that fate determines how relationships form over many lifetimes. In the case of this story, the two intersecting lives are those of Na Young aka Nora (a captivating Greta Lee) and her childhood friend Hae Sung (Teo Yoo). A complication is Nora’s New York Jewish husband Arthur (John Magaro).
There is not so much dialogue, so the city scenes and the haunting score (from composers Danial Rossen and Christopher Bear) can be enjoyed as the characters gently interact. Told in three segments 12 years apart, this is an achingly tender tale of love and loss that is highly commended.
Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)
A review of the new film “Pain Hustlers”
November 8th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
A Netflix film starring Emily Blunt (“A Quiet Place”), Chris Evens (“Captain America”) and Andy Garcia (“Book Club”) has to be worth seeing, right? Well …The story is interesting enough: based on real events, it explains the role of key personnel at one of the pharmaceutical companies behind the opioid epidemic that has ravaged the United States in the last two decades (what is called Zanna in the movie was actually Insys Therapeutics and the fentanyl drug was marketed as Subsys). So why is it so disappointing?
Perhaps because there is too little focus on the victims rather than the perpetrators. Perhaps because the massive fraud is represented in too comical a style. Perhaps because the director David Yates is clearly better suited to his four “Harry Potter” and three “Fantastic Beasts” fantasy films than such a serious issue as opioids.
Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)
The next General Election …
November 7th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
will be held on Thursday, 7 November 2024 – a year today.
Remember where you heard it first.
Posted in British current affairs | Comments (0)
Why we should spend more time talking to strangers
November 7th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
When I took my granddaughters for lunch in a restaurant and I asked the waitress where she was from, my eldest granddaughter said: “Granddad, you talk to everyone.” I guess she’s right.
When my son was speaking at my 75th birthday event and the launch of my memoir, he joked that I wanted to know the story of everyone there. And I guess he was right.
Each week, I volunteer at the Older Persons’ Unit of St Thomas’ Hospital in London. Often I find myself just listening to the patient’s story.
Currently, I’m working on a project to interview staff and residents in my block of flats in central London and I’m going to (self) publish their stories in a book for each of them
This is just what I do. I’ve never really given it much thought.
But a recent article in the “Guardian” newspaper said:“While we tend to focus on our close relationships, psychologists have noticed that even what they call “minimal social interactions” can make us feel happier and more connected. One study found that people who had a brief chat with their barista, or simply made eye contact and smiled, felt happier and experienced a greater sense of belonging than those who treated the human being in front of them as an extension of the coffee machine.”
When I think about it, I really enjoy ‘recognising’ people and checking in on them. It’s good for them – but it’s also good for me.
You can learn more about talking to strangers from this piece in the “Guardian”.
Posted in My life & thoughts | Comments (0)
A review of the new David Fincher film “Killer”
November 6th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
Director David Fincher is the master of the thriller movie – think “Seven” or “Fight Club” or “Gone “Girl”. Here the tension begins with the jarring opening credits and never caeses for the next two taut hours.In his first screen role for four years, Michael Fassbender plays a superbly professional assassin – never named – who suddenly finds that the hunter has become the hunted. Fassbender – who is rarely off the screen – is brilliant as he methodically travels from one location to another to find and eliminate his adversaries in echoes of “Kill Bill”. Based on a French graphic novel, it is not simply that the point of view is that of the killer but we inhabit his mind as we hear him mentally repeat his mantra and listen to a series of music tracks from The Smiths.
The entire film is wonderfully stylish, but there are two stand-out scenes: a brutal fight sequence with a character simply titled The Brute (Sala Baker) and an ice-cold encounter with The Expert (a brilliant Tilda Swinton). This could have been a classic but it is let down by an anti-climactic ending. However, if you like the John Wick movies, this is for you.
It will be on Netflix in a week’s time.
Posted in Cultural issues | Comments (0)
Is there intelligent life out there or are we alone in the universe?
November 5th, 2023 by Roger Darlington
If it is suggested that humankind is probably the only intelligent life in the universe, some people condemn this as an arrogant thought. But this is not a matter of attitude or emotion; it is a matter of science and probability.On the one hand, it seems impossible that humans can be alone in the universe. A typical galaxy can contain around a billion stars and there are thought to be approaching 200 billion galaxies in the observable universe. On average each star has two or three planets revolving round it, so there must be millions in the ‘goldilocks zone’ where it is not too cold or too hot for liquid water to exist (which is the basis of any life that we can understand).
On the other hand, the existence of humankind on planet Earth revolving round the Sun is the result of a whole series of highly improbable variables. One of these is the ‘jump’ from single cell organisms to multi-cell organisms, something which is sometimes known as ‘the fateful encounter’ that has happened only once in more than 3 billion years of the existence of bacteria. Such an encounter does not guarantee the evolution of intelligent life forms; after all, Earth has experienced five great extinctions when substantial proportions of life on the planet were wiped out. So us being here is quite improbable.
There is actually something called the Drake Equation that attempts to give some sort of guidance as to the probability of intelligent life. It consists of seven key variables. The last of these is the length of time for which intelligent civilisations release detectable signals into space. Humans have only existed for a tiny fraction of the past life of the universe and may not continue to exist for long in the future life of the universe. So, even if other intelligent life has existed, maybe it did not coincide with our existence as a species.
I find the detectable signals variable of the Drake equation the most compelling in terms of deciding whether there is any other intelligent life out there. Any intelligent life must use parts of the electromagnetic spectrum to communicate – as we do with telecommunications, radio, television and the like – and, even if they had no wish to communicate with other intelligent life in the universe, these signals would travel through the universe for ever. Forget flying saucers and the like – how is it that we have never detected any such signals? Even ET phoned home.
On the balance of current evidence, I think that our working assumption has to be that we are alone. If we are the only intelligent life form that exists or has ever existed, we have a tremendous responsibility to preserve humankind and make it as civilised as possible.
Posted in Science & technology | Comments (4)