A review of the 1964 epic war movie “Zulu”
No less than 11 Victoria Crosses were awarded to the British defenders of Rorke’s Drift at the battle in Natal which took place on 22-23 January 1879. Amazingly some 150 British soldiers, around 30 of them sick or wounded patients in a field hospital, held off a force of about 4,000 Zulu warriors. Inevitably there are all sorts of small historical inaccuracies, but basically this film tells a true story in dramatic style.Shot mostly on location in South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province with the cooperation of the local military and hundreds of Zulu extras, the movie looks wonderful. The music is by John Barry and the main theme jacks up the drama. Although the central narrative celebrates a heroic action by the imperialist British, the work makes a real point of celebrating the skill and courage of the Zulus. Both sides are seen using clever tactics.
“Zulu” was directed and co-written by American Cy Enfield. Three of the leading British parts were taken by Stanley Baker as the senior officer who was actually an engineer with little experience of action, Michael Caine in a break-out role as a young and arrogant officer, and Nigel Green as the seasoned Colour Sergeant. Chief Manosuthu Buthelezi plays the Zulu leader King Cetshwayo, his real-life maternal great-grandfather. I could have done without Jack Hawkins in a caricature of the Swedish missionary, but generally the support roles are well-cast.
This is quite a long film – 138 minutes – but it is carefully paced with the tension and action ratcheting up and, as British action movies go, it is one of the best.